Archive for the ‘Healthcare’ category

Kennedy and Oz

January 10th, 2025

Before transitioning from music to healthcare, as a student, we learned about the works of composers like Igor Stravinsky, Arnold Schoenberg, and Bela Bartok. These men contributed uniquely to the evolving musical landscape with their creative works. Schoenberg, for example, revolutionized music by developing atonality and the twelve-tone technique. Not unlike what was happening with visual artists like Picasso, they were breaking new ground, moving away from tradition and accepted norms.

The traditionalist and the audiences did not consider their work to be acceptable. Schoenberg faced harsh criticism. His music was called incomprehensible, and the public often condemned it. Due to its radical rhythms and dissonance, Stravinsky’s “The Rite of Spring” (1913) caused a riot at its premiere.

Over time, their work gained widespread recognition as groundbreaking.

Now that the United States political dust has settled and the reality of the next four years is upon us, the question of what Dr. Mehmet Oz and Robert Kennedy Jr will potentially bring to the picture of healthcare reform is very much up in the air.

If confirmed as Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS), Robert F. Kennedy Jr. would oversee the CDC, FDA, and NIH. As Secretary of HHS, Kennedy would manage a $1.7 trillion budget. He has indicated that his agenda includes challenging Big Pharma and its current practices, reforming dietary guidelines, and dealing with chronic diseases through stricter food and pesticide regulations.

While his positive focus on transparency and chronic disease prevention resonates with many, his other controversial stands face scientific and political opposition.

Dr. Oz’s potential appointment to head the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid is also controversial. As a heart surgeon, a communicator, and a champion of wellness and prevention, Dr. Oz receives high praise. He also believes he can eliminate waste from the $1 trillion CMS budget.

The challenges faced by Oz and Kennedy might be similar to those of the musicians mentioned above in the sense that they will be potentially maneuvering upstream through white water. A primary difference is that they will be rocking a multi-trillion-dollar healthcare boat funded by lobbyists representing organizations from Big Pharma, Agri-food, Alcohol, Tobacco, the Fast Food industry, and even oil and additive companies that sell dyes and preservatives, all contributors to the food industry in this country.

The science has been strong against many of the methodologies and advertising techniques employed by these industries in the United States. So much so that the European Union, and even countries like India, China, and Japan have banned foods that are a large part of our culture.

In 2001, the Institute of Medicine, an affiliate of the National Academy of Science published “Crossing the Quality Chasm,” a report created by dozens of independent experts who sought answers to how to improve America’s healthcare system. The report concluded that our healthcare system is so convoluted and fragmented, that it wasn’t a system at all. It further concluded that it could not be fixed by merely tweaking parts of the system in isolation. It suggested that a payment system based on the quality of patient outcomes would go a long way to correcting its current design flaws.

One primary goal would be to engage practitioners who have proven track records in wellness and prevention. Thousands of these practitioners have offered a multitude of therapeutic interventions that can quantify and demonstrate patients’ return to a healthy state. We know that diet, exercise, stress management, and social support can reduce the need for polypharmacy intervention.

Chronic diseases account for 90% of U.S. healthcare expenditures, while end-of-life care represents about 25% of Medicare spending annually. At some point, change seems to be inevitable. If they survive their tenure in government, maybe someday they too will be acknowledged for contributing to a better future.

Share

Meditation and Neuroplasticity

August 27th, 2023

           Back in the 1960s or as the Brits nicknamed it, The Swinging Sixties, lots went on that some of us would prefer to remember as interesting, youthful experiences that created lifetime memories.  Besides the British music invasion, drugs became popular and commonplace among the hippie generation, but I missed out on all of that because my education took place at a conservative school.

          Being a traditional student heading toward a teaching career also meant that my career would be significantly jeopardized had I not stayed within the parameters of expected behavior. Unfortunately, the movie, Animal House, was not a realistic depiction of my college experience.

          One phrase that did catch on during that liberal era of the late 60s and early 70s was “Don’t bother him, he’s contemplating his navel.” It’s thought that it became popular in Western culture during a time when the Beatles and other luminaries were practicing transcendental meditation.            This navel-gazing phrase related to introspective thinking and mindfulness through meditation. It  implied the person in question was engaged and completely focused on their own thoughts or mental silence. If done correctly, one’s emotions often feel disconnected from the outside world.

            Since that time, numerous well-known people have found meditation to be an important part of their lives. Meditation practicing entertainers include Hugh Jackman, Ellen DeGeneres, Jerry Seinfeld, Katy Perry, and the late basketball great Kobe Bryant who practiced meditation to enhance focus and mental resilience as part of a daily training routine. Of course, there are also thought leaders like the Dalai Lama, Drs. Deepak Chopra and Dean Ornish, publisher Arianna Huffington, the entrepreneur Russell Simmons, and former NFL player Ricky Williams who are famously recognized for using these mindful practices.

            Individuals who practice meditation regularly credit the practice with positive outcomes ranging from better sleep, stress reduction, relief from both anxiety and depression, much-improved focus and concentration, enhanced self-awareness, better relationships, lower blood pressure, pain management, enhanced creativity, spiritual growth, and one of my favorites, neuroplasticity.

            Several studies have shown that practicing and playing musical instruments can significantly contribute to neuroplasticity. Music can enhance fine motor skills, auditory processing, memory and pattern recognition, multi-sensory integration, cognitive flexibility, brain connectivity, and brain reserve.

            Neuroplasticity is the underlying property of the brain that includes learning, adaptation, and recovery from injuries. It truly represents the brain’s ability to rewire itself. With that in mind, neuroplasticity contributes significantly to education, therapy, and overall cognitive health.

            If I recommended that you meditate for 10 or 20 minutes in the morning and again at night, you might snicker and suggest that not only do you not have time, but more bluntly that you also think it’s a waste of time. If I told you that by doing so you could significantly impact the creation of new neural connections that would modify your brain’s function in ways that would permit you to improve and optimize your performance while adjusting to new circumstances, you also might suggest that I move on.

            Let’s, however, look at the list of positives related to further development of neuroplasticity beginning with the fact that it will allow you to acquire new skills, knowledge, and behaviors. It also enables you to adjust, and more importantly, to adapt to changes in your environment.  It contributes significantly to more efficient memory storage, the capacity to adapt and remain functional as we age, and the ability to shift perspectives and respond to new challenges. And the list goes on and on.

            If you’re a type A, hyper-active person, meditation may provide you with a welcome relief from yourself. Find a peaceful, quiet space, force yourself to focus on the present, breathe deeply and use that breath to anchor. Acknowledge external interferences but don’t dwell on them and remember that contemplating your navel by deep breathing alone will create a natural relaxation response that is good for your health. Try it. You might like it.

Share

Tops in Care in PA

August 14th, 2023

If you were to see a list that included UPMC Shadyside, UPMC Passavant, St Clair Hospital, Geisinger and Chan Soon Shiong Medical Center, but no other local hospitals in this immediate geographic region, your initial question might be something like, “What’s this list represent?”

Here’s the succinct answer to that question for people living in the Greater Johnstown Area. This is part of a list of the top rated hospitals in Pennsylvania.  

 Let’s be perfectly clear about this, too. When you consider every aspect involved in evaluating a hospital for elite status, it’s very relevant that this is not some type of purchased PR accolade meant to create a smoke-screen for publication. It is, in fact, the result of serious patient analytics by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid. More importantly, it is a sincere recommendation meant to assist patients in their healthcare selections.

 No, Chan Soon-Shiong Medical Center is not in the same league clinically as the hospitals listed above in range of services, but the services offered there do contribute significantly to one very important aspect of evaluation. When patients are asked if they would recommend CSSMC, their sincere answer to many detailed questions is “Absolutely, yes.” In other words, the range and scope of services offered at CSSMC are top-notch.  

 If you’re wondering how an achievement like this is possible, there is only one answer, teamwork, teamwork under the umbrella of incredible clinical leadership that is endorsed at the very top by the CEO, Tom Kurtz. Dr. David Csikos, MD, Chief Medical Officer, and Sherri Spinos, Vice President of Nursing are two of the hundreds of members of the CSSMC staff who should be standing in the winner’s circle accepting this Gold Seal of approval.

 Not only did Tom Kurtz, CEO turn around a small rural hospital that, like all of its peers in the State at that time, was heading toward either merger or closure, he did it with a spirit of good humor, compassion, kindness and positive energy. His positive energy was passed on to CSSMC’s physicians and staff in ways that create patient satisfaction at the highest levels.

 Congratulations to Chan Soon-Shiong, to Tom Kurtz and the Windber clinical leadership, staff, and physicians involved in this significant accomplishment. They have achieved “Best of Show” as Blue Ribbon winners in this national recognition. As the former Windber Medical Center continues to achieve these incredible quality standards as a small, rural hospital, we need to recognize and thank them for their efforts to provide quality healthcare to our region.

 They’ve done it again. Keep up the magic.     

 

Becker’s Hospital Review

The top recommended hospitals in every state

Mackenzie Bean (Twitter) – Friday, August 4th, 2023

Becker’s has compiled a list of the hospitals patients are most likely to recommend in every state using Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems data from CMS.

CMS shares 10 HCAHPS star ratings based on publicly reported HCAHPS measures. The recommended hospital star rating is based on patients’ responses to the question, “Would you recommend this hospital to your friends and family?” Hospitals must have at least 100 completed HCAHPS surveys in a fourth-quarter period to be eligible for a star rating. Learn more about the methodology here.

The star rating is based on survey data collected from hospital patients from October 2021 through September 2022. The figures are from CMS’ Provider Data Catalog and were released July 26. Asterisks denote that CMS included a footnote about the organization’s data, which are summarized below.

The hospitals that received five stars for patient recommendations in every state:

Pennsylvania
Advanced Surgical Hospital (Washington)
AHN Hempfield Neighborhood Hospital (Greensburg)
Bryn Mawr Hospital
Chan Soon-Shiong Medical Center at Windber
Chester County Hospital (West Chester)
Doylestown Hospital
Edgewood Surgical Hospital (Transfer)
Evangelical Community Hospital (Lewisburg)
Geisinger Jersey Shore Hospital
Geisinger St. Luke’s Hospital (Orwigsburg)
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia)
James E. Van Zandt VA Medical Center (Altoona)
Lebanon VA Medical Center
OSS Orthopaedic Hospital (York)
Paoli Hospital
Physicians Care Surgical Hospital (Royersford)
Rothman Orthopaedic Specialty Hospital (Bensalem)
St. Clair Hospital (Pittsburgh)
St. Luke’s Hospital-Anderson Campus (Easton)
Surgical Institute of Reading (Wyomissing)
Troy Community Hospital
UPMC Passavant (Pittsburgh)
UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside (Pittsburgh)

Share

A Possible Solution to Local Rural Physician Shortage

February 23rd, 2023

The Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) projects that a physician shortage could reach a high of 124,000 by 2024. The strain this will cause will not be borne equally.

“The COVID 19 pandemic has highlighted many of the deepest disparities in health and access to health care services,” said AAMC President and CEO David Skorton, “and exposed vulnerabilities in the health care system.”

Gerald E. Harmon, president of the American Medical Association, also raised alarms about the future of U.S. health care.

 “Because it can take up to a decade to properly educate and train a physician,” Harmon said, “we need to take action now to ensure we have enough physicians to meet the needs of tomorrow.”

He added, “The health of our nation depends on it.”

This bleak scenario recently was presented to Indiana Regional Medical Center, Indiana University of Pennsylvania (IUP), and Indiana County leadership.  As a local response, it was suggested that IUP, as one of the larger state universities in Pennsylvania, should take a lead role in creating a rural family practice medical school. Such an initiative would be a game-changer for not only the university but also for the entire Commonwealth.

Over the past ten years, universities throughout the United States have seen declines in student enrollment. These decreases have led to painful programming cuts as well as other downsizing initiatives. Still, most of the exceptionally strong programs still thriving at IUP are heavily directed toward STEM (Science Technology, Engineering, and Math). These programs have had continued robust enrollment numbers in healthcare and science-oriented degrees.

In December, IUP President Dr Michael Driscoll confirmed that the IUP Board of Trustees has approved exploration of this medical school initiative. The caveat? Funding will be a major factor in determining a “go or no go” decision.

The financial challenge may be exacerbated by Duquesne University’s decision to build a College of Oseopathic Medicine, which has garnered support from some Pittsburgh-based granting organizations. This might limit those organizations’ enthusiasm or capacity for an IUP medical school. That would be unfortunate because, although Duquesne University’s medical school is a positive addition to the area, the reality is that urban-trained physicians tend to remain in urban areas, and city training and resources are not always ideally suited for a rural setting.

Therefore, the most critical major potential source of support for this project is the Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education (PASSHE). Working with state legislators,  PASSHE could muster resources that would help create a Western Pennsylvania Medical School based at IUP.

Moreover, each year entry-level seats could be held for students from each of the 14 state universities that come under the PASSHE umbrella: West Chester, Slippery Rock, Shippensburg, Millersville, Mansfield, Lock Haven, Kutztown, Edinboro, East Stroudsburg, Clarion, Cheyney, California, Bloomsburg, and IUP

Numerous potential critical players in this scenario. Including private and community foundations, have not yet fully realized the extent to which a school like this would improve our region. The primary question they should ask is “How do we fill the dozens of physician openings we already have in this area?”

Without a plan to address this challenge, the number of openings will only grow.

Another regional asset that could provide significant depth and impact to this medical school is the Chan Soon-Shiong Institute for Molecular Medicine. CSSI currently houses not only 500,000 donated tissues samples for research, but also has on staff talented PhDs in genomics, informatics, and tissue banking who could contribute extensively to the educational research needed to support a medical school.

Finally, consider the cost we all bear when hiring physicians locally. Because the competition is intense, we must employ recruiters. Other expenses including advertising for the position; fees to locum tenens (substitute docs) during the hiring process; candidate interview costs; time spent on interviewing, onboarding and credentialing the doctor; candidate relocation costs; primary care physician salary and benefits, and incidentals. This list, according to the UNC Solutions blog, totals about $341,000.

Being able to locally source and train physicians from 30-plus graduates a year over a ten-year period would pay for itself three-fold.

We desperately need physicians in our region. We need this medical school. We need to support IUP in this initiative to help give students from Pennsylvania an opportunity to go to medical school in our region because that will ultimately benefit everyone in our region.

Share

Guest Post Dr Dan Handley

July 6th, 2022

I attended a video conference tumor board today as a guest observer.

If you don’t know what a tumor board is, it is an interdisciplinary team of professionals that can include oncologists, geneticists, and others such as pharmacists, nurses, genetic counselors, bioinformaticists, and anyone else who can help by providing their professional expertise.

Tumor boards systematically examine cancer patient histories, current clinical test results, and any other relevant information. As a team, they come together to propose the optimal treatment and support for patients based on the latest scientific information.

These are consummate professionals who are dedicated to understanding each patient’s unique situation and work together to provide the best care possible with the best outcomes combining their respective areas of expertise. It’s amazing to see such communication and cooperation. That’s not hyperbole, it’s the truth.

I understood all the underlying science since that is what I’ve been involved with for so many years in laboratory research, and it’s now what I teach, Not being an oncologist myself there were some learning opportunities for me on some of the clinical details. I am an information sponge, though, so I’m delving deeper into the clinical literature to make sure I understand anything that wasn’t completely clear to me.

Despite some people’s uninformed cynicism, we have thousands of dedicated professionals working together both on the scientific front and the clinical front in synergy to cure each person’s cancer if possible, prolong quality life, and at least minimize suffering. And along the way, gathering all of our understanding towards finding a way to cure as many cancers as possible.

It’s an honor to be involved in this continuing endeavor with so much promise and progress, and even more, to have students who want to participate in this amazing transformation of medicine into the 21st century.

Share

The Integrative Journey

March 28th, 2022

 

After having returned from the Ornish Coronary Artery Disease Reversal program in Sausalito, California, my life, my mental health, and my view of healthcare had been changed forever. Having previously been selected as the CEO of a traditional hospital that, like all hospitals, was all about sickness, I now realized I had new tools in my toolbox, new arrows in my quiver, and new eggs in my basket. . . you get the idea.

That workshop had taught me that there is no one right way to go through life, to achieve a better quality of life, to deal with health issues, and to survive this journey. I came home armed and informed that sickness could be stopped or reversed, and this concept did not just apply to heart disease. There was significant evidence that Type 2 diabetes, some autoimmune diseases, erectile dysfunction, some prostate cancers and other diseases could be positively impacted by diet, exercise, stress management and group support.

As Americans in one of only two developed countries that permits advertising of pharmaceutical products on our air waves, we had been carefully trained, pruned, mentally shaped and, if you will, brainwashed to believe in the “heal to the pill” method of care. We get sick, go to the doctor or hospital, are prescribed pills, and move on. Or we get a shot, or get the offending body part cut out, and life goes on, or not. Those were the options previously permitted on the proverbial healthcare menu.

It was only a few years later when the chief scientific officer of a major drug company explained his world to me like this, “You don’t understand the pharmaceutical industry. We’re like the movie business. We only want the blockbusters. We want to give you a pill that you’ll have to take from the time you’re five until you die at 75 or 80 that will never make you better. It will just help control the symptoms.”

In 1987, I was working toward another Masters Degree at Carnegie Mellon University, and our epidemiology professor challenged us to find something that would significantly alter the health, lives, or future of at risk people in our hospital’s catchment area. I decided to have our physicians give pneumococcal (pneumonia) vaccines to our at-risk senior population.

When I told my CEO of that plan, he suggested I present it to the primary care physicians at their monthly meeting. I boldly stood in front of a room full of internal medicine and family practice physicians and made my pitch. You would have thought I asked them to bring in their first born child to be assassinated. I was very nearly strung up. I heard cries like, “How are we supposed to pay or bills? How can we pay off our loans? What am I supposed to do, pull my kids out of college? Treating those patients is how we make our livings.”

Ironically, in 2017, I found myself in front of the leadership of a major health system with 125 cardiologists, and I informed them we were going to enter into the coronary artery disease reversal program. The spokesperson for the group put up his hand and said, “Let’s talk about the elephant in the room, do we really want these people to get better?”

Bottom line, we have created a medical industrial complex that is dependent upon sickness, and what I had learned in California was, “Yes, we’re all going to eventually die, but why not give your body a chance and live as healthy as you can for as long as you can?”

Interestingly, the Ornish program was not yet being offered in many places in the country, and when I asked if we could bring it to Western Pennsylvania, there was a long pause on the other end of the line, and Dr. Ornish asked,”What do you want?” He explained that he was working on a licensing project with our local Blue Cross, and I was not going to be able to bring it into my hospital, but that didn’t stop me.

We worked out a deal with some local churches to bring elements of the program that were available to the public just to test the water. Within weeks, we had heart disease participants in their 60’s, 70’s, and 80’s doing stretching exercises, meditation in whatever form they selected, nonjudgmental group support, and vegetarian covered dishes to church halls and basements.

The amazing thing about this program was that people who were suffering from angina pectoris (chest discomfort) found relief in sometimes less than a few weeks. They were no longer living in fear of dropping dead, and more importantly, they were taking control of their life without having to be afraid of the outcome. It was giving their bodies a chance to do what those bodies are so great a doing, healing.

Of course no good deed goes unpunished, and those non-believers, or those individuals who were potentially most negatively impacted by a health and wellness program began to identify me as a zealot, a fanatic, a vegetarian warrior. I was openly mocked at board and physician meetings when I ate my specially prepared vegetarian meals, and when I started holding meetings on the indoor track we had created with our new wellness center, those who would not benefit from my new found center for wellbeing went on a mission to discredit these ideas.

At one point the powerful head of a local Baptist Church began to take steps to have various conservative sects actually picket our hospital for teaching yoga and trying to take away the souls of our participants. (Their interpretation of yoga.) One of our powerful physicians sent emails on a regular basis to our staff with the intention of discrediting me and my programs for wellness and prevention. It was not unlike Salem, Massachusetts for a few years. Then something incredibly powerful occurred.

I was, for only the second time in my 30+ year career in hospital administration, invited to have dinner at a physician’s home. At that dinner, I was seated beside our local congressman, John P. (Jack) Murtha. The host’s wife did not know what to prepare for my meal so she gave me a large white plate with two egg whites on it. When the Congressman saw it, he asked, “What the heck is wrong with you?” I carefully explained my experiences in California with heart disease reversal, meeting patients who had successfully stopped and or reversed their disease, and how well they were living. He leaned back and said, “We’re spending a billion dollars a year on heart disease in the military. Maybe if you got to Bethesda or Walter Reed and find someone who would work with you, I might be able to help>”

We knew that his 25 plus years in Congress had given him some seniority, but what I didn’t realize was that he was in charge of the subcommittee on appropriations for the department of defense. His committee was responsible for well over $300B dollars of government spending. Well, my board chair was a former Navy airman and he flew me to Bethesda where we met with and were politely turned down by the Navy. A few months later when I was in D.C. for a meeting, I got in a cab and, without any knowledge of military life, command, or structure, I showed up at the front door of Walter Reed Army Military Hospital which became Walter Reed National Military Medical Center Bethesda several years later.

When I walked inside, I saw hundreds of soldiers, family members, and medical personnel, but I didn’t have an appointment. Consequently, I walked up to the first white coat I saw, explained who I was, where I was from, and who had suggested I come there. Serendipitously, he was the only physician who had ever received a federal earmark and it was about $75M from Senator Ted Stevens of Alaska to create a center for the study of prostate cancer. He looked at me, smiled, and said, “Follow me.”

After meeting with a Walter Reed cardiologist, I went home, wrote a white paper, and several months later we established two Ornish Centers, one at Walter Reed and one at Windber with a grant that was made possible through Congressman Murtha. The reason you need to understand this back story is that without these grants, there would have been no way a hospital our size could have supported a program featuring integrative medicine.

Share

COVID VACCINE CHALLENGE

September 23rd, 2020

COVID vaccine challenge
NICK JACOBS
Published Tue Sep 22, 2020 8:48 PM EDT

Besides wearing a mask, which we’ve known since 77AD protects us from the plague, the other best opportunity for stopping the progress of COVID-19 is through the discovery of an effective vaccine.

Rather than getting COVID via the natural infection pathway, a vaccine could produce herd immunity without harming or potentially killing people.

Thousands of Americans seem to have chosen the risk-it-all route as they go without masks, and attend large, unprotected social events and rallies.

Unfortunately, not unlike playing Russian Roulette with your loved ones and friends, this route is filled with potential suffering and an almost complete lack of predictability.

In an article in Time magazine, Alice Parks recounts how it was Edward Jenner who, in 1790, discovered that infecting people with small amounts of smallpox virus could produce immunity. Today, there are more than 100 vaccines being developed in an attempt to provide us with immunity from SARS COVID-19, and across the world, billions of dollars are being pumped into this effort.

There are numerous challenges to be faced in this effort including those of manufacturing and then distributing the vaccine in a humanitarian manner.

The good news is, regardless of political pressure, the major vaccine makers have already pledged to conduct complete safety studies before submitting their vaccines to international regulators. The not-so-good news is HIV/AIDS has been around for nearly 40 years and an effective vaccine is still not available.

Approximately 132,000,000 people in the United States are living with pre-existing health conditions. Thus, the challenge becomes who gets a vaccine and when. These decisions may literally produce a life and death lottery game.

The Time article cited researchers from CUNY’s School of Public Health’s computer simulation that calculated if 75 percent of the world’s population were immunized, to control the ongoing pandemic, vaccines would need to be about 70 percent effective. Any of us who are regular recipients of the annual flu vaccine know that some years it’s effective and some years it’s not.

Consequently, we will be faced with arguments over the world’s current state of nationalism combined with America’s anti-vaccination movement. Plus we still have the challenges of discovery, manufacturing and actual implementation.

Oh, and there’s one more speed bump in that the United States has chosen not to join the other 172 countries of the world in the COVAX initiative on international unity for epidemic preparedness innovations originated by the World Health Organization.

If we prioritize our high-risk populations which include health care employees, first-responders, people with pre-existing conditions, and the elderly living in group environments, and then add critical workers such as teachers, food growers and service providers, people in group homes and the incarcerated, we finally end up getting the vaccines to our most precious hope for the future, young adults and children.

In short, none of this is going to be easy. One batch of improperly manufactured polio vaccine in the 1950s resulted in thousands of children being accidentally infected with polio. and because there are so many variations of vaccines being developed, there is also the risk of triggering excessive immune responses that could end up being more harmful than helpful.

Finally, and this is one more example of the broken public health system in this country, any plans for massive immunizations will be dependent upon public-health initiatives that are appropriately supported and resourced.

Keep in mind many of our states have been seeking leadership, supplies, direction, and funding from the federal government since March. At about $35 per dose and in most cases the vaccines require two doses, herd immunity is not likely to be achieved either quickly or in a cost-effective manner.

One thing is clear, however. An effective plan needs to be implemented to stop this out of control COVID transmission and to produce a clear pathway to normalcy. We need to get back to normal through a national strategy.

 

Share

Meditation

August 16th, 2020
Western Pennsylvania Guide to Good Health
Share

Acupuncture why not

February 19th, 2020

 

Accupuncture, why not?

NICK JACOBS

Published Tue Feb 18, 2020 8:15 PM EST

In a recent article in Time Magazine, Jeffrey Kluger wrote “The Mystery of Acupuncture.”

In the article he said the “World Health Organization has declared acupuncture a useful adjunct for more than 50 medical conditions, including chronic stress.” He went on to write that the NIH (National Institute of Health) also agrees and has endorsed acupuncture as a potential treatment for migraines, menstrual cramps, abdominal pain, tennis elbow, and nausea resulting from chemotherapy and more. “The fact the Mayo and Cleveland Clinics have embraced acupuncture and groups like the AMA have gotten states to designate acupuncture as an essential health benefit is more than significant.”

Kluger went on to say that more than 3.5 million adults and 80,000 children use acupuncture in the U.S annually. The military is using it for PTSD, pain disruption, and an assortment of ailments not the least of which is lower back pain. With all this information and these overwhelming statistics, why aren’t more of us using acupuncture?

If it’s fear of needles, you’re uninformed. These needles couldn’t be any smaller and less noticeable. As stated in the article, “The analgesic impact of a tiny needle is more than worth it.” The real beauty of this ancient Chinese practice is even if the practitioner doesn’t do it perfectly, it can’t hurt you.

Probably the most powerful potential use for acupuncture is in the treatment of addiction. Considering that more than 50 million Americans suffer from chronic pain, acupuncture as a treatment for chronic pain is one possible alternative to OxyContin and other addictive pain drugs. Of course, spinal manipulation by a physician trained in osteopathic medicine, a DO, or a chiropractor, plus yoga, and potentially non-addictive cannabinoids are also being used.

There have been more than 19,000 papers written about the efficacy of acupuncture, and recently I saw statistics on back surgery that were less than encouraging. According to recent studies, back surgeries are sometimes as low as 30% effective. Moreover, having been personally a regular sufferer from back pain, osteopathic manipulation, exercise, weight loss, and acupuncture have all been medical gifts that have worked beautifully for me over the years.

The question then becomes, why not? Why aren’t you trying acupuncture? Is it because you don’t understand how it works? Is it because some medical professional has indicated it is “woo-woo medicine?” Or is it because you’re afraid of the tiny little needles?

Maybe it is because you’re concerned it might be harmful in some manner? If you could be assured all these are really non-issues, what else would prevent you from trying this?

I’ve often quoted the book “Change or Die” which examines the thesis that many of us would rather die than change. I’m sure this idea sounds incomprehensible to many of you, but think about it. We are inundated every day with advertising, political narratives, and scientific treatises sponsored by organizations, businesses and associations that want us to remain loyal to their financial interests.

I’ll never forget the conversation I had with a scientist who once told me that hydrogenated fats were the biggest medical experiment perpetuated on mankind without our knowledge. It prolonged the life of food on the shelves while killing half a million Americans each year from inflammatory disease.

Industrial farms, Big Pharma, the soft drink and snack food industry all have their stakes firmly planted in the ground, or more specifically in our brains, with millions or billions of dollars of advertising to indoctrinate us over the years.

One of Jerry Seinfeld’s routines talked about food from his era, including boxes of chocolate chip-filled mini cookies that were sold as cereal.

We Boomers all remember hydrogenated margarine that sat on the table all day without refrigeration, those wonderful Twinkies, and, of course, physicians who were featured in ads endorsing the health benefits of cigarettes.

Try acupuncture. It really can’t hurt you.

Share

Integrative Medicine

July 20th, 2018
Having served in healthcare senior leadership for over two decades, my tolerance level for various “healthcare norms,” that revolved around the sometimes-insensitive treatment and care of patients and their families had reached the breaking point.  Consequently, at the end of my 40th decade when I became a hospital CEO, I arrived in the position with a quiver full of change arrows that were sure to shake up the status quo, and it did.Because I had entered the healthcare field some twenty years after most of my senior leadership peers, my life experiences were much more varied and non-traditional. For ten years, I had been a band and orchestra director in both City and Urban school districts.  After that, I ran what became a successful arts organization in a rural area, and finally, served as the CEO of a convention and visitors bureau.  It was during those years that I went back to school for another Masters degree in public management/health systems management.

When this CEO opportunity presented itself, I realized how each and every one of my life experiences could help me run a hospital, but not just any hospital. It was my vision to create a hospital that embraced all modalities used in integrative medicine with the ambiance of a fine hotel and the amenities of a health spa.  We carefully scrutinized and then credentialed practitioners specializing in massage therapy, integrative nutritional counseling, acupuncture, osteopathic manipulation, pet and music therapy, reiki, and spirituality to name a few. These practices intermixed with traditional Western medicine became our new norm.

As the traditionalists who are reading this article begin to shake and scream about a lack of medical evidence, I can only point to the 19,000 papers written supporting the efficacy of acupuncture and the thousands of other medical papers written about the healing powers of music, massage, and such. In that same spirit, there is also the fact that the head is connected to the body and provides a mind-body connection that doesn’t fit neatly into the scientific “heal to the pill” mentality of our current system.As a non-clinician, non-scientist, it was easy for me to believe in things like “the Placebo effect” as well.  It really didn’t matter to me why people got better. It was our goal to create a healing environment where people would not be immersed in fear and trepidation, where their loved ones could comfortably stay with them, and where unnecessary paging, and middle of the night prodding, and wake-ups were avoided as much as humanly possible.

It seemed to me that by training our employees at Disney University, allowing them to learn from the Ritz Carlton, and exposing them to sensitivity and emotional quotient training, we could create a healing environment. Because my philosophy was that you could not change the human condition, but you could change the condition under which humans worked, we also embraced an anti-bullying environment where employees were cherished and recognized for their contributions to the welfare of our patients.

How did implementing all of these ideas change healthcare in our little slice of Camelot?  Our infection rate dropped to below 1% and stayed there for eleven years. (The national average is nine percent.) And I know we weren’t washing our hands more than they were at other hospitals. Of our peer hospitals, we had the lowest readmission rates, restraint rates, and lengths of stay, and when the naysayers saw these numbers, they said it was because we were not a large hospital. My belief was that we successfully had created a healing environment where our patient’s white blood cells were actually able to function to fight off infection.  We were transparent, nurturing, and caring. We were not a “Healthcare FACTORY” where the patients became widgets in an Industrial Revolution model of care.

Music was always used in healing ceremonies by an indigenous man. Acupuncture has been deemed effective for over 5000 years. Massage makes you feel better, and sometimes your spine gets out of alignment and needs to be corrected. This is neither rocket science nor brain surgery. It’s about love, kindness, and caring, wrapped up in good Western medicine. Oh, and one more thing.  Even with a palliative care unit, a hospice, we had the lowest death rate of our peer hospitals. I had always wanted to put up a billboard that said, “Come to our hospital . . . you’ll die less often.”
Share